亚洲天堂

Skip to content

High school students discuss pros and cons of lowering voting age to 16

Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP鈥檚 bill to lower the voting age will return to HOC for second debate
30385212_web1_220929-PRU-vote-16-bill-school-responses-Taylor-Bachrach-graduation_1
Taylor Bachrach, MP for Skeena-Bulkley Valley, spoke at the Charles Hays Secondary School graduation ceremony on June 10, 2022 in Prince Rupert. (Photo: Taylor Bachrach鈥檚 Facebook page)

Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP Taylor Bachrach鈥檚 private members鈥 bill to lower the voting age to 16 will be returning to the floor of the House of Commons for a second debate and for a vote in the next week.

The second hour of debate is scheduled for Sept. 23 with the vote planned for the following week, on Sept. 28, Ben Tassell, Bachrach鈥檚 assistant, stated. However, these dates could still change, Tassell added.

During the first debate on May 4, Bachrach argued that issues facing the nation today, such as housing affordability, student debt, sustainability of the health care system, and climate change, have a profound impact on young people and their futures.

Frances Taylor鈥檚 social studies class at Smithers Secondary weighed in on the advantages and disadvantages of lowering the voting age last June.

Students suggested having a chance to vote before leaving their home community would be a benefit of making the legal voting age 16, Taylor said.

鈥淭hey can go through the process with the guidance of their parents, of their family, rather than being off at university when they first qualify or off at their first job. And they aren鈥檛 able to have some help through that first process,鈥 Taylor said.

Families could help new voters navigate the logistics of the process including how to register, how to get a voting card and where to go on the day of the election, Taylor explained.

Students also said that having the school鈥檚 support was a benefit.

鈥淪ince we do a lot of learning in school and they get exposed to all the different candidates, they would have a broader understanding of the candidates on their first go around,鈥 Taylor said.

The class also came up with some disadvantages to giving 16-year-olds a vote.

Some students felt like their peers might just vote the same way as their parents do. Others thought they would deliberately choose an opposing candidate from their parents.

鈥淪ome of the kids said, 鈥榃e鈥檙e not mature enough to take it seriously, so don鈥檛 give us the vote鈥,鈥 Taylor recalled.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a real range, some [students] are really, like, 鈥業 would take it seriously, it would be good to do it when I have support and education.鈥 And then others are, like, 鈥榥o, forget it鈥,鈥 Taylor said.


 Kaitlyn Bailey | Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Send Kaitlyn email
Send The Observer email
Like the on
Follow us on